This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Re: Microsoft XML


I find this extremely offencsive to Microsoft, whoever wrote that section
needs to be informed that Microsft do not plan on making their own version
of XML, i see this almost as a racist comment against Microsoft!

We'll all see in the near future that Microsoft will conform to the
standards at an high level.

Yours Martin Gallagher

XML @ http://www.StylishMonkey.com - The Dynamic Web Experience!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Galbreath" <mgalbrea@maximgroup.com>
To: <xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 3:10 PM
Subject: [xsl] Re: Microsoft XML


> Admittedly, I am new to XML/XSL; this is from Brett McLaughlin's "Java and
XML," (O'Reilly 2000):
>
> "The Microsoft parser has been intentionally left out of this list; from
all appearances, Microsoft does not now or in the future intend to conform
to W3C standards.  Instead, Microsoft seems to be developing their own
flavor of XML.  We have seen this before...be careful if you are forced to
use Microsoft's parser" (p. 24).
>
> Brett McLaughlin, as you probably know, has teamed up with Jason Hunter
("Java Servlet Programming" (O'Reilly 2001) and James Duncan Davidson
(author of the JAXP specification) to create JDOM (now at RC-7).
>
> As for my requirements, the client has a legacy SQLServer 7.0 databse.
The idea is to permit its web content authors to change text and graphics
through an admin interface based on XML templates that are tranformed via
XSLT to HTML.
>
> Cheers!
> Mark
>
> > From: "Robert Koberg" <rob@koberg.com>
> > Date: 2001/08/15 Wed AM 09:27:09 EDT
> >
> > MS has no way to propriatize XML. If you are saying that Oracle has one
way
> > to handle XML and MS has another then you would be more accurate.
> >
> > First, why do you need SQL server?  Are you going to store content as
blobs
> > or are you going to break apart the document for searches? What kind of
> > documents? Are you sure the filesystem will not work (load the XML (or
> > references to) at server startup)? This is often the best option
especially
> > for a pre-generated site.
> >
> > Here is a free middleware solution for XML to RDB:
> > http://www.rpbourret.com/xmldbms/ -- this guy (Ron Bourret) also
maintains a
> > long list of XML DB solutions)
> >
> > There is also the Native XML DB option.  But your client probabaly
already
> > owns MS SQL...
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]