This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [Ann] jd.xslt - a XSLT 1.1 processor

To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Subject: Re: [xsl] [Ann] jd.xslt - a XSLT 1.1 processor
From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian dot rahtz at computing-services dot oxford dot ac dot uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 15:55:04 +0000
References: <5.0.2.1.1.20010308140232.00a44cc0@pop.puretec.de><15015.39027.433471.754130@spqr.oucs.ox.ac.uk><119193457336.20010308153214@jenitennison.com>
Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com

Jeni Tennison writes:

 > You can avoid xsl:document being instantiated by testing the version
 > of XSLT supported by the processor:
 > 
...

 > I hope that helps,

it does. thats much clearer than my fumbling around!

the reason I got confused early on was (I now realize) because XT did
not conform to the spec, and I had naively thought it would in this
respect.

sebastian

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

References:
- [Ann] jd.xslt - a XSLT 1.1 processor
  - From: Johannes Döbler
- Re: [Ann] jd.xslt - a XSLT 1.1 processor
  - From: Sebastian Rahtz
- Re: [Ann] jd.xslt - a XSLT 1.1 processor
  - From: Jeni Tennison

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]