This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: RDDL as a delivery vehicle for XSLT extensions?
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] RDDL as a delivery vehicle for XSLT extensions?
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 10:35:01 GMT
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103030215080.29911-100000@clarkevans.com>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> Not quite so fast.
>
> 1) Now you need to now syncronize all of the
> prefixes across your organizaiton.
No. As in other uses (like extension-element-prefixes) the prefix
is just a local pointer to the URI. Prefixed son't have to match with
the prefixes actually used on function calls.
> 2) You are still limited to implementations in the
> languages referenced in this imported style-sheet
> since there are no other resolution mechanisms.
>
No. If a processor finds an extension function in some namespace it can
do whatever it wants to find a definition for that function. If
xsl:script doesn't supply one (or even if it does) it may use some other
mechanism.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list