This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: XSLT 1.1 comments

To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments
From: Francis Norton <francis at redrice dot com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:39:25 +0000
References: <4F4182C71C1FDD4BA0937A7EB7B8B4C1D1566F@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <3A8D0C29.C1C4A855@redrice.com> <200102161147.LAA19452@penguin.nag.co.uk>
Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com

David Carlisle wrote:
> 
> > Agreed. Anyone interested in doing a "lint" style transform for checking
> > transform portability?
> 
> Is there really anything other than don't use extension functions and
> try not to use disable-output-encoding?
> 
Someone mentioned "sort" as a possible source of portability problems?

Francis.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

References:
- RE: XSLT 1.1 comments
  - From: Joshua Allen
- Re: XSLT 1.1 comments
  - From: Francis Norton
- Re: XSLT 1.1 comments
  - From: David Carlisle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]