This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re: Char node-type)
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re: Char node-type)
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 09:25:15 GMT
- References: <20001124042119.1885.qmail@web6303.mail.yahoo.com>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
> In my opinion there must be some requirements in the standard
> specifications about the minimum expected robustness and reliability of
> an XSLT processor. A good and necessary requirement of this type is
> that an XSLT processor should not crash in typical recursive
> processing.
If I recall, scheme (and XSL's parent, DSSSL) mandate that
implementations perform tail recursion elimination. XSLT of course
hardly mandates anything about implementaions at all.
However it would be good to know if the common implementations
do do this, you said saxon does, what of the others?
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list