This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: testing node type
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: testing node type
- From: Kay Michael <Michael dot Kay at icl dot com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:06:49 +0100
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
> > > > <xsl:if test="following-sibling::node()[1][self::comment()]">
> > I think following-sibling::node()[1]/self::comment() should work as
well.
>
> So, implementor out there,
> can you tell me which is _theoretically_ faster?
In Saxon they do follow different paths in the code, but the access path is
the same in both cases, so I can't think of any reason why one should
perform better than the other.
Mike Kay
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list