This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages


At 23:03 7/09/2000, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:

> > OmniMark advantages :
> > - Less resource hogging
>
>I beg to differ.  Given an 150 Mb XML input file, my memory usage with 
>Omnimark 5.1 grew to 400 Mb, and I was working with a strictly local program.

I think Omnimark will take as much memory is
available, but no more.

How much memory would be required when using
XSLT to parse 150Mb? (Several gig?)

J


-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@steptwo.com.au


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]