This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages


> OmniMark advantages :
> - Less resource hogging

I beg to differ.  Given an 150 Mb XML input file, my memory usage with Omnimark 5.1 grew to 400 Mb, and I was working with a strictly local program.

Additionally Omnimark has serious trouble with underscores in element-names.  Apparenly XML-input data has to conform to a DTD, which does not always apply for our data.

> - For any other format -> XML, Omnimark is mandatory

Not entirely so.  XML is very easy to generate with Perl, and it is equally easy to parse a lot of non-complex text formats in Perl (if you can put it in a regular expression).  Parsing XML with Perl is rather slow, though.

-- 
  Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen             "...and...Tubular Bells!"
  http://bigfoot.com/~thunderbear


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]