This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: Best XSLT processor?
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: Best XSLT processor?
- From: Linda van den Brink <lvdbrink at baan dot nl>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:12:32 +0200
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
First read this FAQ http://www.netcrucible.com/xslt/msxml-faq.htm to
understand the issues with MSXML (the processor you're using). Different
versions of it are going around and one of them doesn't implement XSLT, but
a very outdated version of XSL.
If you want to switch to another processor I'd suggest SAXON. Very very
compliant.
Linda
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heiner de Wendt [mailto:H.dewendt@systec.de]
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 8:26 AM
> To: XSL-List@mulberrytech.com
> Subject: Best XSLT processor?
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm working with XMLSpy editor, which has no built-in XSLT processor.
> Currently, I'm using the MS processor, as is the default setting. My
> question: Is there any 'better' one out there that I could use with
> XMLSpy? Are there any known problems with the MS XSLT processor?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Heiner
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list