This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: Best XSLT processor?


First read this FAQ http://www.netcrucible.com/xslt/msxml-faq.htm to
understand the issues with MSXML (the processor you're using). Different
versions of it are going around and one of them doesn't implement XSLT, but
a very outdated version of XSL. 

If you want to switch to another processor I'd suggest SAXON. Very very
compliant. 

Linda

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heiner de Wendt [mailto:H.dewendt@systec.de]
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 8:26 AM
> To: XSL-List@mulberrytech.com
> Subject: Best XSLT processor?
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm working with XMLSpy editor, which has no built-in XSLT processor. 
> Currently, I'm using the MS processor, as is the default setting. My 
> question: Is there any 'better' one out there that I could use with 
> XMLSpy? Are there any known problems with the MS XSLT processor?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Heiner
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]