This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: more on XSLT processor performance
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: more on XSLT processor performance
- From: Kay Michael <Michael dot Kay at icl dot com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:21:25 +0100
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
> I agree. Saxon, at the current point in time, seems to be the winner.
> However, I'd like to see more compiled XSLT processors than Java ones.
> 5.5 hours to process a 69 MB file is not practical -
Compiling won't solve the memory problem. If we're going to make XSLT
processing of such large files practical, the only way we'll do it is by
using persistent storage rather than memory for the tree.
Mike Kay
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list