This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: xsl question (Checking for the existance of a tag)

To: <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
Subject: Re: xsl question (Checking for the existance of a tag)
From: "Nikolai Grigoriev" <grig at iitp dot ru>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 16:28:19 +0400
References: <38E98549.3DE5BAB9@crtc.corp.mot.com> <38E9807D.8A5@es.co.nz> <38E9A959.878CB25A@crtc.corp.mot.com> <38E9A738.29D7@es.co.nz>
Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com

Dan Morrison wrote:

> On my parser I can get away with <xsl:for-each><xsl:value-of
> /></xsl-for-each>. I love shortcuts!

Looks like good old C ( while(*a--=*b++) etc ;-)), but -- 
isn't it contrary to XML spirit of explicitness? 

Regards,
Nikolai

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Follow-Ups:
- Re: xsl question (Checking for the existance of a tag)
  - From: Dan Morrison

References:
- xsl question
  - From: Alankar Chowdhury
- Re: xsl question (Checking for the existance of a tag)
  - From: Dan Morrison
- Re: xsl question (Checking for the existance of a tag)
  - From: Alankar Chowdhury
- Re: xsl question (Checking for the existance of a tag)
  - From: Dan Morrison

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]