This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: Future XSLT extensions. document(). Summary.
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: Future XSLT extensions. document(). Summary.
- From: Scott Sanders <ssanders at octane dot com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:06:37 -0800
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Didier said:
I am now too tired to argue and will just express an opinion. I totally
disagree with you on (C). The actual document() function is and will be
tremendously useful for XML based web services.
I am in total agreement. The document() function is THE MOST USEFUL item in
XSLT, unless you count the entire concept of XSLT. I am defining screens in
XML, and process them through XSLT. Any listbox that needs to be filled is
filled using the document() function to get that list from the database.
Without the document() function, XSLT is extremely limited.
Scott Sanders
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list