This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: Updated XSL support in IE5?
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: RE: Updated XSL support in IE5?
- From: Sebastien Sahuc <ssahuc at imediation dot com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:33:43 +0100
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Please have a look at the article from www.xml.com explaining how to
use ie5 xsl stuff.
http://www.xml.com/pub/2000/02/09/ms/index.html
But as you correctly stated, don't bother to much with this new
-limited- preview.
Sebastien
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Norman Walsh [mailto:ndw@nwalsh.com]
> Sent: mardi 22 février 2000 12:55
> To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
> Subject: Updated XSL support in IE5?
>
>
> Ok, <aside>given that the updated XSL module for IE5 supports
> neither named templates nor modes, I'm not sure why I'm even
> bothering, but anyway...</aside> I sat down to update my IE5 XSL
> stylesheet for a simple subset of DocBook and discovered that I
> cannot make it work. At all. The MSXML2 scripting demos that
> come from MS work, so I've definitely installed the new stuff.
>
> Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong here? Here's the stylesheet:
>
> <?xml version='1.0'?>
> <xsl:stylesheet
> xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" version="1.0">
> <xsl:output method="html" indent="yes"/>
>
> <xsl:template match="article">
> <html>
> <head>
> <title>foo</title>
> </head>
> <body>
> <xsl:apply-templates/>
> </body>
> </html>
> </xsl:template>
>
> <xsl:template match="article/title">
> <h1><xsl:apply-templates/></h1>
> </xsl:template>
>
> <xsl:template match="para">
> <p><xsl:apply-templates/></p>
> </xsl:template>
>
> </xsl:stylesheet>
>
> And here's the test document:
>
> <?xml version='1.0'?>
> <?xml-stylesheet href="sdocbook.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
> <article><title>Article Title</title>
> <para>Paragraph.</para>
> </article>
>
> The result in IE5 is a completely blank screen. Fiddling with
> the scripting stuff from their demos, I can demonstrate that
> MSXML2 'does the right thing', but why won't it actually display
> the result in the simple case?
>
> Be seeing you,
> norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | "Abstraction, abstraction and
> http://nwalsh.com/ | abstraction." This is the
answer
> | to the question, "What are the
> | three most important words in
> | programming?"--Paul Hudak
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive:
http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list