This is the mail archive of the
xconq7@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Xconq project.
Re: occupant combat in standard game
- From: Jim Kingdon <kingdon at panix dot com>
- To: skeezics at q7 dot com
- Cc: xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:45:37 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: occupant combat in standard game
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401280139250.13461-100000@q7.q7.com>
> Why make it illegal? "They could have been out for a pleasure jump, at
> night, to be scooped up into a passing transport out of eel-infested
> waters..."
And how do you explain the reverse move (from the troopship to the
bomber) :-)?
Seriously though, I think this is a case where simplicity should trump
realism. It isn't as if moving an infantry from one bomber/troopship
to another is a particularly powerful move (I use bomber->bomber from
time to time, often as part of fuel management, but it rarely makes or
breaks much of anything).