This is the mail archive of the xconq7@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Xconq project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: AI now goes after bases

From: Jim Kingdon <kingdon at panix dot com>
To: mcdonald at phy dot cmich dot edu
Cc: xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 18:18:26 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: AI now goes after bases
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312311340460.31528-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu>

> But perhaps the victim finder should make an assumption that
> capturable, immobile transports are "facility" or "base" units and
> spare them an untimely death before being assimilated by the AI's
> side?

I'm not sure "immobile" belongs here, but aside from that this might
be right.

The problem I could see with exempting them from victim_here is that
the AI doesn't necessarily get around to capturing them.  But maybe
that change would be best despite this issue.

References:
- Re: AI now goes after bases
  - From: Eric McDonald

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]