This is the mail archive of the xconq7@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Xconq project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: side_controls_unit vs. tk interface

To: shebs at shebs dot cnchost dot com
Subject: Re: side_controls_unit vs. tk interface
From: Jim Kingdon <kingdon at panix dot com>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:12:53 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <200010060716.DAA01265@panix2.panix.com> <39DDF2C3.5DB770BA@shebs.cnchost.com>

> The theory is good, but is there some reason the test can't go into
> REQUIRE_UNIT?

do_distance, do_occupant, and do_recenter call REQUIRE_UNIT but don't
want to call side_controls_unit.

Believe me, the thought occurred to me as I was doing all that editing
;-).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: side_controls_unit vs. tk interface
  - From: Stan Shebs

References:
- side_controls_unit vs. tk interface
  - From: Jim Kingdon
- Re: side_controls_unit vs. tk interface
  - From: Stan Shebs

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]