This is the mail archive of the xconq7@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Xconq project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Freeciv vs. Xconq

To: Hans Ronne <hronne at pp dot sbbs dot se>
Subject: Re: Freeciv vs. Xconq
From: Stan Shebs <shebs at shebs dot cnchost dot com>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 06:54:23 -0700
CC: xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <l03130300b5fffc193f56@[212.112.3.129]> <l03130300b6011a9fbadf@[212.112.3.231]>
Reply-To: shebs at shebs dot cnchost dot com

Hans Ronne wrote:
> 
> So does Freeciv allow
> more unit types now than Civ2? I think that is the single most important
> limitation in Civ2.

Yes, the upper limit seems arbitrary, set to 200 types in my
sources, but looks like it could go even higher if desired.

(Which reminds me, Xconq probably no longer has the 126 unit
type limitation, since that was motivated by view layer
storage, which is now done with objects - but we should
test before claiming!)

Stan

References:
- Re: Freeciv vs. Xconq
  - From: Hans Ronne
- Re: Freeciv vs. Xconq
  - From: Hans Ronne

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]