This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tapsets/17928] A number of the systemtap.syscall/syscall.exp tests fail on 32-bit arm because size_t sign extended to 64-bit value


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17928

William Cohen <wcohen at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Attachment #8112|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #10 from William Cohen <wcohen at redhat dot com> ---
Created attachment 8113
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8113&action=edit
Revised patch that also fixes  size argument for __syscall.recv


before patch on arm-32
Running ./systemtap.syscall/syscall.exp ...
FAIL: 32-bit dup syscall
FAIL: 32-bit fadvise64 syscall
FAIL: 32-bit keyctl syscall
FAIL: 32-bit mmap syscall
FAIL: 32-bit recv syscall
FAIL: 32-bit recvfrom syscall
FAIL: 32-bit send syscall
FAIL: 32-bit sendmsg syscall
FAIL: 32-bit shmat syscall
FAIL: 32-bit uid syscall

        === systemtap Summary ===

# of expected passes        104
# of unexpected failures    10
# of untested testcases        1
# of unsupported tests        6


Afterward patch:
Running ./systemtap.syscall/syscall.exp ...
FAIL: 32-bit dup syscall
FAIL: 32-bit fadvise64 syscall
FAIL: 32-bit keyctl syscall
FAIL: 32-bit mmap syscall
FAIL: 32-bit uid syscall

        === systemtap Summary ===

# of expected passes        109
# of unexpected failures    5
# of untested testcases        1
# of unsupported tests        6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]