This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
[Bug tapsets/17928] A number of the systemtap.syscall/syscall.exp tests fail on 32-bit arm because size_t sign extended to 64-bit value
- From: "wcohen at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: systemtap at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:27:26 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tapsets/17928] A number of the systemtap.syscall/syscall.exp tests fail on 32-bit arm because size_t sign extended to 64-bit value
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-17928-6586 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17928
William Cohen <wcohen at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #8112|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #10 from William Cohen <wcohen at redhat dot com> ---
Created attachment 8113
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8113&action=edit
Revised patch that also fixes size argument for __syscall.recv
before patch on arm-32
Running ./systemtap.syscall/syscall.exp ...
FAIL: 32-bit dup syscall
FAIL: 32-bit fadvise64 syscall
FAIL: 32-bit keyctl syscall
FAIL: 32-bit mmap syscall
FAIL: 32-bit recv syscall
FAIL: 32-bit recvfrom syscall
FAIL: 32-bit send syscall
FAIL: 32-bit sendmsg syscall
FAIL: 32-bit shmat syscall
FAIL: 32-bit uid syscall
=== systemtap Summary ===
# of expected passes 104
# of unexpected failures 10
# of untested testcases 1
# of unsupported tests 6
Afterward patch:
Running ./systemtap.syscall/syscall.exp ...
FAIL: 32-bit dup syscall
FAIL: 32-bit fadvise64 syscall
FAIL: 32-bit keyctl syscall
FAIL: 32-bit mmap syscall
FAIL: 32-bit uid syscall
=== systemtap Summary ===
# of expected passes 109
# of unexpected failures 5
# of untested testcases 1
# of unsupported tests 6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.