This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
Re: Systemtap on ARM arch results summary
- From: William Cohen <wcohen at redhat dot com>
- To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh dot kamboju at linaro dot org>, dejazilla at elastic dot org
- Cc: systemtap at sourceware dot org, Dave Long <dave dot long at linaro dot org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:05:34 -0400
- Subject: Re: Systemtap on ARM arch results summary
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CA+G9fYtV4apghaFPDQcD7-xbvG_Ua1mEUi=jcxVYfOQdwzAPXA at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 06/12/2014 01:37 AM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Host: Linux linaro-server 3.15.0-rc5-00020-gf903094-dirty #13 SMP
> PREEMPT Wed Jun 4 18:07:32 UTC 2014 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux
> Snapshot: version 2.6/0.158, commit release-2.5-141-ge56d75e47590 + changes
> GCC: 4.8.2 [gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) 4.8.2]
> Distro: Linaro 14.04
> target board: arndale
>
> Tested by: Dave Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
>
> === systemtap Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes 3747
> # of unexpected failures 335
> # of expected failures 287
> # of unknown successes 1
> # of known failures 51
> # of untested testcases 204
> # of unsupported tests 7
>
> Best regards
> Naresh Kamboju
>
Hi Naresh,
Glad to hear that you got the tests up and running. You mentioned that this a self hosted build of the kernel. It is pretty easy to compare the various armv7 testsuite runs on:
https://web.elastic.org/~dejazilla/viewsummary.php?_offset=0&_limit=20&_sort=1A&summary=&age=&rg=&tool=&variant=%3D%27armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf%27&versions=&pass=&fail=&kpass=&kfail=&xpass=&xfail=&untested=&unresolved=&unsupported=&warning=&error=
I noticed there are some additional failure in your testsuite run. 335 vs 94. Do you have uprobes turned on for the kernel?
https://web.elastic.org/~dejazilla/viewrgdiff.php?rg1=382655&rg2=964991&_offset=0&_limit=10000&_offset=0&testcase=&r1=&r2=
However, it looks like the tests on my arm chromebook were abbreviated due to a tcl error during the syscall.exp test, resulting in fewer total passes.
-Will