This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: stap results on powerpc on latest systemtap snapshot.

From: David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, SystemTap ML <systemtap at sourceware dot org>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:24:22 -0600
Subject: Re: stap results on powerpc on latest systemtap snapshot.
References: <20111027080911.GA19468@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1320660936.3902.15.camel@springer.wildebeest.org>

On 11/07/2011 04:15 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:

>> FAIL: 64-bit dup nd_syscall
>> FAIL: 64-bit eventfd nd_syscall
>> FAIL: 64-bit inotify nd_syscall
>> FAIL: 64-bit net1 nd_syscall
>> FAIL: 64-bit pipe nd_syscall
>> FAIL: 64-bit poll nd_syscall
>> FAIL: 64-bit signal nd_syscall
>> FAIL: 64-bit signalfd nd_syscall
> 
> I am seeing these too. Probably need tweaks to the argstr parsing for
> powerpc. Most of these also fail on my x86_64 setup though.


See pr11424 (<http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11424>) for
one reason why 'kprobe' probes are broken on all platforms.

-- 
David Smith
dsmith@redhat.com
Red Hat
http://www.redhat.com
256.217.0141 (direct)
256.837.0057 (fax)

References:
- stap results on powerpc on latest systemtap snapshot.
  - From: Srikar Dronamraju
- Re: stap results on powerpc on latest systemtap snapshot.
  - From: Mark Wielaard

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]