This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: stap fails if !CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER && !CONFIG_UTRACE


On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 13:49 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 17:13 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > * Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com> [2010-06-10 13:20:51]:
> > > 
> > > Is there a reason it isn't? It seems necessary for unwinding through
> > > kretprobe instaces. See bug #11641 for example.
> > 
> > Guess you meant uretprobe instances?
> 
> Yes, sorry, typo. I meant through uretprobe instances.

So, to answer my own confusion a bit. Frank pointed out the obvious on
irc. That the uprobes-in-kernel doesn't have uretprobe support yet. So
whichever way we test, for uretprobe support we currently need the
systemtap uprobes variant, which requires utrace support.

Frank pushed Tony's commit.

Cheers,

Mark


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]