This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tapsets/7030] New: signal tapset may be referring to inline functions.


__group_send_sig_info and specific_send_sig_info seem to be inlined in 2.6.27
kernels. 
__group_send_sig_info and specific_send_sig_info are now just wrapper functions
for send_signal.
Though this issue has been talked in
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1155, we could fix this by
make changes in signal.stp to refer to send_signal rather than
__group_send_sig_info and specific_send_sig_info. 

Currently the failure message when running  sig-by-pid.stp on 2.6.26+ kernel:
stap sig-by-pid.stp 
semantic error: failed to retrieve location attribute for local 'sig'
(dieoffset: 0x4e01ef): identifier '$sig' at
/usr/share/systemtap/tapset/signal.stp:92:11
semantic error: failed to retrieve location attribute for local 't' (dieoffset:
0x4e01e5): identifier '$t' at :93:12
semantic error: failed to retrieve location attribute for local 'sig'
(dieoffset: 0x4e031b): identifier '$sig' at :92:11
semantic error: failed to retrieve location attribute for local 't' (dieoffset:
0x4e0311): identifier '$t' at :93:12
semantic error: failed to retrieve location attribute for local 'sig'
(dieoffset: 0x4e17ef): identifier '$sig' at :92:11
semantic error: failed to retrieve location attribute for local 't' (dieoffset:
0x4e17e5): identifier '$t' at :93:12
semantic error: failed to retrieve location attribute for local 'sig'
(dieoffset: 0x4e1fa3): identifier '$sig' at :92:11
semantic error: failed to retrieve location attribute for local 't' (dieoffset:
0x4e1f99): identifier '$t' at :93:12
semantic error: failed to retrieve location attribute for local 'sig'
(dieoffset: 0x4e01ef): identifier '$sig' at :92:11
Pass 2: analysis failed.  Try again with more '-v' (verbose) options.

sig-by-pid.stp is a pretty popular script with customers and It got a mention in
a developerworks article.

-- 
           Summary: signal tapset may be referring to inline functions.
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: tapsets
        AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: srikar at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7030

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]