This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the systemtap project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: kprobes_stack.patch

From: Jim Keniston <jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com>
To: SystemTAP <systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: 11 May 2005 11:01:11 -0700
Subject: Re: kprobes_stack.patch
Organization:
References: <1115833531.4511.3.camel@dyn9047018078.beaverton.ibm.com>

On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 10:45, Jim Keniston wrote:

> Testing
> I have tested with a combination of kprobes, jprobes, and return
> probes, including a probe set in an interrupt handler.  I have not
> done severe stress testing or SMP testing.  I'll post this patch and
> accompanying test modules to CVS.
> 
> I haven't tested this with REGPARM configured, but the register usage
> is such that it should work with or without REGPARM.

I forgot to mention that I've tested with and without CONFIG_4KSTACKS
enabled.

Jim

References:
- kprobes_stack.patch
  - From: Jim Keniston

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]