This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the pthreas-win32 project.
Re: Crash when re-initializing as static library
- From: Ross Johnson <Ross dot Johnson at homemail dot com dot au>
- To: pthreads-win32 at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:47:25 +1100
- Subject: Re: Crash when re-initializing as static library
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <527BA16A dot 3050404 at tara-systems dot de>
Thanks for providing the extra context. I'll apply your suggested
change/s, probably early next week.
On 8/11/2013 1:19 AM, Klaus Fischer wrote:
Let me give you a little background in order to understand my situation:
I'm actually using the Portable SDK for UPnP Devices (libupnp), which
in turn relies on pthreads. I'm developing cross-plattform
(Windows/Linux), so I need Pthread-Win32 (henceforth called PTW32) to
enable libupnp to run under Windows.
libupnp in turn initializes and deinitializes PTW32 every time libupnp
itself gets initialized/deinitialized. De-/initialization of PTW32 is
explicitly done via pthread_win32_process_* when libupnp is compiled
for WIN32 and PTW32 is used as a static library. This is still done
that way in the latest libupnp release (1.6.18).
One of my first tests was to repeatedly call UpnpInit()/UpnpFinish()
to check for general stability, which is also always a good test for
software cleanliness according to my experience; unfortunately, this
immediately resulted in the access violation in PTW32.
It looks like libupnp still has to adapt to the changed calling
behavior of PTW32, although they had plenty of time for it (the latest
libupnp release is from January 2013, while the latest PTW32 is from
May 2012). They probably overlooked the change in calling
pthread_win32_process_*; I will send them a note for it.
Nevertheless, I will continue to use my locally patched version of
PTW32 until either libupnp adapted to the changed PTW32 behavior or
PTW32 is available with initialization of globals during the attaching
phase. I've ran into the same problem in some of my libraries too, and
decided to give my globals a proper initialization in an
Init()-function to avoid such issues during repeated
de-/initialization. It would be nice if you could consider doing this
in PTW32 too, just for the sake of backwards-compatibility (if this
actually worked in pre-2.9.0 versions).
> Applications statically linked with current versions of the library
no longer need to call those routines explicitly. From
> These functions contain the code normally run via DllMain
> when the library is used as a dll. As of version 2.9.0 of the
> library, static builds using either MSC or GCC will call
> pthread_win32_process_* automatically at application startup and
> exit respectively.
> But you are also detaching and reattaching within the same process,
which is unintended use. Is this how you expect to use the library or
are you just analysing?
>> On 7/11/2013 4:53 AM, Klaus Fischer wrote:
>> Dear pthreads-win32 developers,
>> I have experienced a crash when building pthreads-win32 as static
library and re-initializing it using the following sequence:
>> - pthread_win32_process_attach_np()
>> - pthread_win32_process_detach_np()
>> - pthread_win32_process_attach_np()
>> The global variable ptw32_threadReuseTop still points to memory
used between the first attach/detach run, but this memory was already
freed in function ptw32_processTerminate(), which was called during
>> When using e.g. pthread_self() afterwards, the global
ptw32_threadReuseTop now points to invalid memory, causing an access
violation writing to that memory location.
>> A simple code change fixed that problem by assigning the default
value PTW32_THREAD_REUSE_EMPTY to that global variable at the end of
function ptw32_processTerminate(), after the while loop freeing all
still allocated thread handles.
>> A better way to fix that would probably be to initialize all the
library globals of global.c during the attaching stage. In a static
library, those globals are only initialized once when the process
starts, but _should_ be re-initialized on every attach.
>> I know this is not a concern when using this library as dynamic
library, but since there is an option to use it as static library and
other people also use it that way according to the mailing list, it
would be great if it could survive multiple re-initializations.
>> Thanks in advance,