Re: Avoid implicit declarations in long double complex functions

["Dionna Amalie Glaze via newlib" <newlib at sourceware dot org>]

I reapplied the patch on a fresh clone here.


On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 4:05 AM Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Dionna,
>
> On Jun 12 17:14, Dionna Amalie Glaze via newlib wrote:
> > Hi y'all, I came across some compilation errors that the following patch
> > fixed. Most long double complex math functions use long double real
> > functions that are only defined #ifdef _LDBL_EQ_DBL, so I extended that to
> > the functions that use them.
>
> Your patch doesn't apply, Pretty much all hunks have fuzz, and
> git am returns with "error: corrupt patch at line 241"
>
> Can you check, please?  If that's a MUA isssue, you could attach
> the patch as plain text.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen
> Cygwin Maintainer
> Red Hat



-- 
-Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)

Attachment: 0001-Wrap-complex-math-definitions-in-ifdefs.patch
Description: Binary data