This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Unify names of all lock objects

From: Freddie Chopin <freddie_chopin at op dot pl>
To: newlib at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:09:27 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unify names of all lock objects
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <1485727465.1255.1.camel@op.pl> <588EDD02.7080109@embedded-brains.de> <1485759342.1208.1.camel@op.pl>

On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 07:55 +0100, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> Alternatively I could do "__<name>_[non]recursive_lock" and this
> would
> not conflict with any function name, but it's not really better than
> the "object" suffix.

Another option: "__<name>_[recursive_]mutex".

Regards,
FCh

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Unify names of all lock objects
  - From: Sebastian Huber

References:
- [PATCH] Unify names of all lock objects
  - From: Freddie Chopin
- Re: [PATCH] Unify names of all lock objects
  - From: Sebastian Huber
- Re: [PATCH] Unify names of all lock objects
  - From: Freddie Chopin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]