This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Hans-Bernhard, On Aug 22 00:18, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote: > [Now subscribed to newlib list to follow this there, too] Cool! I think we can drop the cygwin ML list from CC then. The winsup dir is not affected by this problem. To wit, it has it's own kind of problems, mainly that it does not use automake at all and that it's using a perl script to wrap the compiler invocation instead of using more standard means. But I digress. > Hi Corinna, hi everyone on both lists > > Am 21.08.2016 um 20:15 schrieb Corinna Vinschen: > > [CC newlib mailing list since it affects newlib in the first place] > > > On Aug 21 14:28, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote: > > > Am 21.08.2016 um 12:30 schrieb Corinna Vinschen: > > > > And while I'm at it: what _is_ the dependency handling here, anyway? I > > > can't seem to find any. Which could indeed explain the problem. > > > That's because dependency handling is basically non-existing in newlib. > > > Nobody added a patch yet to do that. Newlib being open-source, there's > > of course nothing keeping anybody from adding it (*nudge*, *nudge*). > > That wouldn't be so much a patch as a redesign, I'm afraid, because it's > strongly tied to the following: > > > A big problem for many people keeping them from provide patches to the > > configury is that newlib's build system still requires the automake > > --cygnus option, which isn't supported by automake for quite some time. > > And one of the effects of --cygnus is: to enables option "no-dependencies", > thus turning off dependency tracking. Hrmpf. Oh! I really didn't know that. > So let's see how far I get trying to un--cygnusify newlib (as part of > Cygwin): Yeah, a full solution would also un-cygnusify libgloss, but it's not used in Cygwin so you won't notice. > 1) Get rid of for'cygnus' options. In all 134 Makefile.am replace > > AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = cygwin > by AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = foreign no-installinfo no-dist > and delete cygnus from one or two AM_INIT([]) calls, too > > 2) autoupdate in newlib, using autoconf-2.69 and automake-1.15 > 3) autoreconf in newlib, using autoconf-2.69 and automake-1.15 > 4) run "make" in my build dir > 5) touch libc/locale/setlocale.h > 6) run "make" again > > Et voila! Step 6 now recompiles 4 files that depend on setlocale.h, then > re-builds the libraries using them Yay! > 7) Get a rough glimpse of what I did: > > $ git diff --stat newlib | tail -1 > 438 files changed, 264967 insertions(+), 101151 deletions(-) > > Well, that's what you get for having generated files like Makefile.in, > configure and aclocal.m4 in version control... Ok, that's a a minor problem, just lots of bytes to push. All ex-Cygnus trees (gcc, binutils-gdb, newlib-cygwin) have the generated files as part of their repository. If you're willing to provide a patch, the patch does not have to contain the generated files. I would create them locally and push the result. > > The trick is to use an older versions of automake for rebuilding the > > configury. I'm having goods results with this script, which can be > > called from newlib or the libc/libm subdirs: > > > > #!/bin/bash > > aclocal-1.12.2 -I. -I.. > > autoconf > > automake-1.12.2 --cygnus --no-force > > Side note: in a cygwin environment (or any that uses Gentoo's > automake/autoconf wrapper scripts), this should be reducible to: > > WANT_AUTOMAKE=1.12 autoreconf -I. -I.. Ok, thanks. > But I'm afraid the time this approach worked reliably may be nearing its > end. Automake-1.11/1.12 appears to be no longer fully compatible with > current versions of Perl. At least I don't remember having had error > messages like this back when 1.12 or 1.11 were still on point: > > main::scan_file() called too early to check prototype at > /usr/bin/aclocal-1.11 line 644. Yeah, I was already wondering about this. Patches *extremely* gratefully accepted. > > The autoconf version actually doesn't matter much so I'm using 2.69. > > That did not work for me. config/override.m4 insisted rather strictly that > only 2.64 is allowed to be used. I shredded lines 30ff. from that file to > get past that one. Same here. Neither Jeff nor I are autotools experts, so we would be mightly happy if we could get patches to pull the repo to a newer autotools state. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |