This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> -----Original Message----- > From: newlib-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:newlib- > owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 4:00 PM > To: newlib@sourceware.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two version of newlib > library in one tool-chain release > > Hi Bin, > > On Aug 14 15:03, Bin Cheng wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: newlib-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:newlib- > > > owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Johnston > > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 12:48 AM > > > To: newlib@sourceware.org > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two version > > > of newlib I think _nano is better since the specs file is called > > > called nano.specs and it is a new invention no one will be familiar > > > with yet. The nano version of the library has some caveats that the > > > end-user needs to understand so make it easier for them to find the > documentation and understand what it is. > > > > > Thanks for the comments. > > Here comes the patch using lib*_nana.a, please review. > > You accidentally missed to attach the patch. > Sorry about that. The patch can be simply replaced by sed. Thanks, bin > > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen > Cygwin Maintainer > Red Hat
Attachment:
nano-spec-20140814.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |