This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: CVS or git now?

From: Ralf Corsepius <ralf dot corsepius at gmail dot com>
To: Peter Rosin <peda at lysator dot liu dot se>, Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>, "newlib at sourceware dot org" <newlib at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:44:28 +0100
Subject: Re: CVS or git now?
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <52812F85 dot 2030205 at oarcorp dot com> <5282300E dot 3040101 at lysator dot liu dot se>

On 11/12/2013 02:41 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:

On 2013-11-11 20:27, Joel Sherrill wrote:

With all the recent conversion to git of the old src/
tree, I am curious where newlib stands.


I had a brief browse of https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib.git
and that "mirror" looks poor. It has not retained authorship of
the commits, as the committer is always listed as author. Here
is one recent example:

That's they way things always have been in all of the GCC, binutils, gdbetc. repositories, with CVS and SVN.


Ralf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CVS or git now?
  - From: Peter Rosin

References:
- CVS or git now?
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: CVS or git now?
  - From: Peter Rosin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]