This is the mail archive of the
newlib@sourceware.org
mailing list for the newlib project.
Re: fma functions
On Feb 18 13:53, Howland Craig D (Craig) wrote:
> I see two possible approaches to take with respect to this problem:
> 1) Remove the functions (until adequate replacements can be found).
> 2) Point out their shortcomings in the documentation and recommend
> that they not be used.
> [...]
> Personally, I prefer the first approach.
That's not possible. You would break backward shared lib compatibility
with already exsisting applications.
> So finally to the approach question: should the functions be
> removed, or should they be kept with the BUG being documented?
Better document it.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Red Hat