This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] More Arm EABI support routines

From: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: newlib at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 14:07:51 +0100
Subject: Re: [patch] More Arm EABI support routines
References: <200509010003.59351.paul@codesourcery.com> <1125572875.2515.8.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>

> > 2005-08-31  Paul Brook  <paul@codesourcery.com>
> >
> > 	* libc/sys/arm/Makefile.am (lib_a_SOURCES): Add aeabi_memclr.c,
> > 	aeabi_memcpy.c, aeabi_memmove.c and aeabi_memset.c.
> > 	* libc/sys/arm/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
> > 	* libc/sys/arm/aeabi.h: New file.
> > 	* libc/sys/arm/aeabi_memclr.c: New file.
> > 	* libc/sys/arm/aeabi_memcpy.c: New file.
> > 	* libc/sys/arm/aeabi_memmove.c: New file.
> > 	* libc/sys/arm/aeabi_memset.c: New file.
>
> I'm in two minds about this.  Part of me thinks that this should be in
> libgcc rather than newlib, since these are documented as part of the
> standard run-time support for the compiler.

My reason for putting them in libc was that they're then in the same place as 
the underlying mem* routines.

Paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] More Arm EABI support routines
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

References:
- [patch] More Arm EABI support routines
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: [patch] More Arm EABI support routines
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]