Re: ftruncate substitute

[Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>]

Shaun,

  I have just added these.  The file was started by just copying the one in 
include/sys.  I have also removed the CYGWIN references as this file is never 
used by CYGWIN.

-- Jeff J.

Shaun Jackman wrote:
> usleep is implemented in sys/linux/usleep.c, but not exported in
> linux/sys/unistd.h. It is exported in include/sys/unistd.h armoured in
> defined(__CYGWIN__) || defined(__rtems__). glibc exports it in
> include/unistd.h armoured in defined __USE_BSD || defined
> __USE_XOPEN_EXTENDED.
>
> ftruncate is in the same position as usleep. It is defined as a system
> call in sys/linux/io.c and exported in include/sys/unistd.h armoured
> in defined(__CYGWIN__) || defined(__rtems__) || defined(__sh__). glibc
> exports it in include/unistd.h armoured in defined __USE_BSD ||
> defined __USE_XOPEN_EXTENDED.
>
> Can these two declarations be added to linux/sys/unistd.h possibly
> armoured in an ifdef, though I'm not sure which ifdef suits newlib
> best.
>
> Thanks,
> Shaun
>
>
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 18:34:52 -0800, Shaun Jackman <sjackman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm porting a glibc application to newlib. The application uses a
> > couple functions not in newlib, ftruncate and usleep. For usleep I can
> > substitue a call to nanosleep; although I'll probably just implement
> > usleep using nanosleep. With what can I replace the ftruncate function
> > call?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shaun