This is the mail archive of the
newlib@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the newlib project.
Re: Merge of top-level Makefile.in
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Merge of top-level Makefile.in
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 11:38:50 +1100
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com,newlib at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <ork8a13pqb.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> I've just merged the top-level Makefile.in with that of the GCC
> repository, as well as libgcj's. Now they're identical. Please help
> keep them from diverging again. Thanks,
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Index: ChangeLog
> from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
>
> * Makefile.in: Merge with GCC and libgcj.
> (ALL_GCC_C, ALL_GCC_CXX): New macros. Use them as dependencies of
> configure-target-<library> when their configure scripts need the C
> or C++ library to have already been built to work properly.
> (do_proto_toplev): Set them to an empty string.
What is now going to be considered the master? Like a few of the other
top-level files, I suspect one of the N Makefile.ins should be
designated as the master so that all changes get routed through it.
Off hand, I suspect the GDB+BINUTILS+DEJAGN+... version would be best.
Only because it contains the most tools :-)
Andrew