This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] libstdc++/16210

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 10:03:14 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch] libstdc++/16210
References: <40DCB356.4040807@suse.de> <20040626031702.GA9681@disaster.jaj.com>

Phil Edwards wrote:

Works for me.

Fine.

Since we no longer need the strto[u]ll functions, I'm wondering if there's any reason at all to allow 'long long' to be disabled. Any benefit gained by doing so?

Indeed, I'm also thinking about this.

Avoid warnings with -pedantic? Can be an issue...

Paolo.

References:
- [Patch] libstdc++/16210
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] libstdc++/16210
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]