This is the mail archive of the libffi-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the libffi project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: libffi & fork


On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Andrew - it would be nice if we could upgrade RHEL's libffi to a
>> non-ABI breaking 3.0.10. ?If, however, it makes more sense to
>> cherry-pick patches since 3.0.5, I can see some nice ones from mjw and
>> jakub back in 2010, and there are likely more. ?If you think we should
>> open an RFE I can propose some specific patches for consideration.
>> There may only be 4 or 5 and they are all pretty obvious.
>
> I think we should do that.

Hmm.. check out this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772657

If our selinux state detection code really is this fragile, maybe we
should link against libselinux and use is_selinux_enabled() as
suggested in comment 4.

AG


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]