This is the mail archive of the
libffi-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the libffi project.
Re: [testsuite, libffi] XFAIL libffi.call/cls_{,long}double_va.c on IRIX 6.5 (PR libffi/46660)
- From: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
- To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libffi-discuss at sourceware dot org, Andreas Tobler <andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:52:43 +0200
- Subject: Re: [testsuite, libffi] XFAIL libffi.call/cls_{,long}double_va.c on IRIX 6.5 (PR libffi/46660)
- References: <yddd3hx59h6.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <BANLkTi=egX-2FJt0tU3o9rFZdK4kxKF2=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> writes:
> The tests now fail on x86_64-linux and i?86-linux like
>
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 7.0
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 7.0
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O2 output pattern test, is 7.0
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O2 output pattern test, is 7.0
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O3 output pattern test, is 7.0
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O3 output pattern test, is 7.0
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -Os output pattern test, is 7.0
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -Os output pattern test, is 7.0
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output pattern test,
> is 7.0
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output pattern te
> st, is 7.0
>
> spawn [open ...]^M
> 7.0
> res: 4
> 7.0
> res: 4
> PASS: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 7.0
> res: 4
> 7.0
> res: 4
> , should match PR libffi/466607.0^M?
> res: 4^M?
> 7.0^M?
> res: 4
>
> I believe your dg-output first arguments are bogus.
You're right, I'm an idiot ;-) I should have tested on a non-xfailed
target, too.
Fixed as follows, tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and mips-sgi-irix6.5,
applied to mainline and 4.6 branch. The 4.5 branch is unaffected.
Sorry.
Rainer
2011-06-29 Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
* testsuite/libffi.call/cls_double_va.c: Move PR number to comment.
* testsuite/libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c: Likewise.
Index: libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_double_va.c
===================================================================
--- libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_double_va.c (revision 175618)
+++ libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_double_va.c (working copy)
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
/* { dg-do run { xfail strongarm*-*-* xscale*-*-* } } */
/* { dg-output "" { xfail avr32*-*-* } } */
-/* { dg-output "PR libffi/46660" { xfail mips-sgi-irix6* } } */
+/* { dg-output "" { xfail mips-sgi-irix6* } } PR libffi/46660 */
/* { dg-skip-if "" arm*-*-* { "-mfloat-abi=hard" } { "" } } */
#include "ffitest.h"
Index: libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c
===================================================================
--- libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c (revision 175618)
+++ libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c (working copy)
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
/* { dg-do run { xfail strongarm*-*-* xscale*-*-* } } */
/* { dg-output "" { xfail avr32*-*-* x86_64-*-mingw* } } */
-/* { dg-output "PR libffi/46660" { xfail mips-sgi-irix6* } } */
+/* { dg-output "" { xfail mips-sgi-irix6* } } PR libffi/46660 */
/* { dg-skip-if "" arm*-*-* { "-mfloat-abi=hard" } { "" } } */
#include "ffitest.h"
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University