This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libffi project.
Re: Defining a libffi.so.4 ABI
Well, if you would be redefining a new API, there are some things I
would like (out of the top of my head):
a) Treat the return type as part of the CIF. (Why not have all the
static information in it?)
b) Don't treat a void type different than any other type. (Don't
really remember, it led to a quirk in my compiler).
I think if you do that, you'll find it becomes a lot more orthogonal.