Re: libffi 3.0.9 release candidate 1

[Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>]

Anthony Green wrote:
> Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:06:53PM +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse 
> > wrote:
> >  
> > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 12:57:30AM -0400, Anthony Green wrote:
> > >    
> > > > Here's 3.0.9rc1:
> > > > ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/libffi/libffi-3.0.9rc1.tar.gz
> > > >
> > > > I built this out of my new git repository here:
> > > > http://github.com/atgreen/libffi
> > > >
> > > > I'm using stgit, which is like quilt for git.  I rebased the git
> > > > repository to gcc HEAD, then added the "stand-alone" patches (mostly
> > > > configury changes), the AVR port, the Snow Leopard memory protection
> > > > fix, and the 64-bit AIX fix.
> > > >
> > > > I believe we're missing ChangeLog entries from Jens, Abdulaziz, and
> > > > Bradley.  Please send them.  I'll push your changes into GCC once
> > > > they're clean.
> > > >
> > > > Abdulaziz - please also check that I applied your patch correctly.
> > > > The source files had changed somewhat since you submitted it.
> > > >
> > > > I'll set up a wiki page to track platform testing soon, but initial
> > > > test results and pointers to missing patches would be helpful.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > AG
> > > >       
> > > As of this RC, there's an increase of about 340 in failed tests on
> > > OpenBSD. I've attached the log. The unwindtest.cc failure is expected,
> > > ther others not. Anyone has a clue what's going on here?
> > >     
>
> All the closure tests are failing.  Do you have time to help debug this?


I should mention that they work fine on x86_64 linux, so this either has 
to do with x86_64 openbsd bits in the source or perhaps your compiler 
version.  Which version of GCC are you using?

Thanks,

AG