This is the mail archive of the
libffi-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the libffi project.
Libffi merge [Was Re: [patch] powerpc libffi Net/FreeBSD ]
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
- Cc: Andreas Tobler <andreast-list at fgznet dot ch>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Java Patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libffi-discuss at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:39:56 +0100
- Subject: Libffi merge [Was Re: [patch] powerpc libffi Net/FreeBSD ]
- References: <4A256DDD.7060409@fgznet.ch> <4A25C34C.6020403@gmail.com>
Dave Korn wrote:
> Andreas Tobler wrote:
>
>> Ok for trunk?
>>
>> Andrew, I will wait until you did the merge.
>
> We should probably institute a coding standard or other process to avoid
> running into this kind of accidental fork again. Perhaps we could even ask DJ
> to extend his libiberty cross-checker to validate libffi for us as well?
Maybe. Even after my merge there will be some remaining differences.
* Libtool differences
* GPL v3 differences, unless we bump libffi to GPL v3 as well
My first wodge of changes will be only the substantive differences
in the library itself: later I'll get to the testsuite and the rest.
To begin with, I'm just going to update upstream libffi with the gcc
changes, and then see how much difference there is. I'm guessing not
much.
Questions for Anthony Green:
1. I don't understand the libffi version numbers. Can you give
me any explanations? It seems to be 3.0.8 upstream but 2.1 in gcc,
but this doesn't seem in any way to correspond with reality.
2. What's with the ChangeLog.libffi and ChangeLog.libgcj files?
Thanks,
Andrew.