This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: ARM per-thread stack protector
- From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
- To: Will Newton <will dot newton at linaro dot org>
- Cc: libc-ports at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: ARM per-thread stack protector
- References: <CANu=Dmg2m0Kq4AieVnwXTKX8axuuJHv8pagaLxebeV+i9ctv4g at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130719214113 dot EDAD02C0A1 at topped-with-meat dot com> <CANu=DmhQXD2NO4a2ACned-s08m6jzjJaQ2vPO4FppdDejsjiBg at mail dot gmail dot com>
> Thanks for the clarification. So the two methods are functionally identical?
Yes. Where you keep the value is just a matter of optimal implementation
convenience for the particular machine.
> >From what I understand then all that is missing on ARM from that list
> is pointer mangling support?
I have no new information.