This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: [patch] reduce namespace polloution from sys/ucontext.h on arm
- From: peter green <plugwash at p10link dot net>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: libc-ports at sourceware dot org, debian-arm at lists dot debian dot org, debian-glibc at lists dot debian dot org, linaro-dev at lists dot linaro dot org
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 02:16:44 +0000
- Subject: Re: [patch] reduce namespace polloution from sys/ucontext.h on arm
- References: <4EEF8FEE.email@example.com> <Pine.LNX.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
The most obvious users of these definitions would be (native) GDB and
gdbserver - do those still build OK (i.e. include the correct headers to
get the definitions they need and not rely on any definitions that were
removed) after this patch?I have built the debian gdb package (which builds both gdb and
on a system with this patch.
Have you verified that it still works to include both <sys/ucontext.h> and
<sys/procfs.h> in the same source file, in either order?I had already tried that in one order, just tried the other order too.
Both work fine.
When I copied a structure definition over to remove the dependency I
to rename it (following the name used for the equivilent structure on