This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
To: ebiederm at xmission dot com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: Phil Blundell <pb at reciva dot com>, libc-ports at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:14:23 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl
References: <m1zl6w44up.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> <1257771920.1484.57.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> <m11vk7rexl.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>

ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:

> When I have seen them the GNU changelogs seem to be saying I did
> xyz (which you can see from the diff).

Which diff?  There is no diff if you only have the tarball.

> Instead of saying why someone did xyz.

The "why" should be put in a comment.  That's where you look first for
it.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl
  - From: Eric W. Biederman

References:
- [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl
  - From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl
  - From: Phil Blundell
- Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl
  - From: Eric W. Biederman

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]