libc-ports archive
date index for November, 2009

This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

November 12, 2009
17:40 Re: Problem with early startup in dynamic linker. Carlos O'Donell

November 11, 2009
01:41 Re: Update m68k fchownat Joseph S. Myers
01:36 Re: Update m68k fchownat Joseph S. Myers
01:18 Re: Update m68k fchownat Matt Turner

November 10, 2009
21:15 Re: Update m68k fchownat Joseph S. Myers
19:34 Re: Update m68k fchownat Matt Turner
10:33 Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl Andreas Schwab
04:52 Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl Eric W. Biederman
04:46 Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl Eric W. Biederman
00:14 Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl Andreas Schwab

November 09, 2009
19:41 Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl Mike Frysinger
19:35 Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl Mike Frysinger
16:46 Re: Too large messages on glibc-cvs@ Petr Baudis
13:44 Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl Eric W. Biederman
13:25 Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl Carlos O'Donell
13:18 Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl Mike Frysinger
13:15 Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl Eric W. Biederman
13:05 Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl Phil Blundell
12:51 Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl Eric W. Biederman
12:33 Re: [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl Carlos O'Donell
05:58 [PATCH] arm: ioperm use /proc/sys not sysctl Eric W. Biederman
03:22 Re: Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?) Carlos O'Donell

November 08, 2009
22:12 Re: Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?) Mike Frysinger
19:02 Re: Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?) Joseph S. Myers
18:29 Re: Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?) Carlos O'Donell
17:59 Re: Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?) Joseph S. Myers
17:51 Re: Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?) Carlos O'Donell
17:51 Re: Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?) Carlos O'Donell
17:19 Re: Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?) Joseph S. Myers
17:05 Re: Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?) Joseph S. Myers
17:03 Re: Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?) Carlos O'Donell
16:49 Ports status for 2.11 (was: Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11?) Joseph S. Myers
16:34 Re: glibc-ports-2.11 Mike Frysinger
16:33 Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11? Mike Frysinger
16:30 Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11? Thomas Orgis
16:27 Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11? Carlos O'Donell
16:22 Re: glibc-ports-2.11 Alfred M. Szmidt
16:21 Re: Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11? Mike Frysinger
16:17 Will the alpha port be usable for 2.11? Thomas Orgis

November 07, 2009
09:21 Re: [ARM,MIPS,M68K] fallocate prototype fixes Andreas Schwab

November 06, 2009
23:49 [ARM,MIPS,M68K] fallocate prototype fixes Joseph S. Myers
08:28 Re: glibc-ports-2.11 Alfred M. Szmidt
08:08 Re: fix ARMv4T interworking Phil Blundell
02:14 Re: fix ARMv4T interworking Carlos O'Donell
01:07 Re: fix ARMv4T interworking Joseph S. Myers

November 05, 2009
23:39 Re: glibc-ports-2.11 Mike Frysinger

November 04, 2009
19:17 fix ARMv4T interworking Phil Blundell
16:14 Re: Too large messages on glibc-cvs@ Jim Meyering

November 01, 2009
19:04 Re: Update m68k fchownat Matt Turner


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3