This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thursday 15 January 2009 06:11:50 Oliver Falk wrote:Mike Frysinger wrote:On Wednesday 14 January 2009 05:17:27 Oliver Falk wrote:I have a few alpha patches for glibc alpha. I've attached 'em.
Since there's no glibc alpha maintainer (any more) and alpha has been moved to ports, nobody seems to be interested in commiting those.
Do you see any chance for me to make this process a bit more simple?if no one is going to be alpha maintainer, then i wonder if we could rule by community ;)No, not rule by community. That's not what I meant. I was wondering, if someone with appropriate rights could commit 'em.
but there isnt a maintainer and i dont think anyone with commit privs will apply patches. i dont even really know what being a maintainer requires (docs doesnt seem to cover this).
Not totally wrong. :-) But yes, your patch is more correct.at any rate, your dl_support patch is wrong. see the one i wrote instead: http://sources.gentoo.org/gentoo/src/patchsets/glibc/2.9/6018_all_alpha-g libc-2.8-cache-shape.patch?rev=1.1
fair enough
Mike. You have the same problem as I/we have, right? Or don't you mind that your patches are not in upstream cvs?
i dont think distros should have to maintain out of tree patches
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |