This is the mail archive of the libc-locales@sourceware.org mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug localedata/21547] Tibetan script collation broken (Dzongkha and Tibetan)


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21547

--- Comment #17 from Mike FABIAN <maiku.fabian at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Elie Roux from comment #16)
> I've been able to look at things properly and... there is in fact no bug.
> The rules do exactly what they are supposed to do, and the sorted list are
> exactly as the reference dictionary. I was wrong when I suggested that 
> 
> &ཉ<<ྋྙ<གཉ<གཉྫ
> 
> would be correct. It would seem more natural to me, but the dictionary I
> took as a reference does not say that at all... This is a pretty specific
> case,  and the sorting of transliterated Sanskrit is sort of a grey area,
> but I think we can keep that. I'm really sorry for the inconvenience.
> 
> Would that be ok?

But what is the purpose of line 7:

https://github.com/eroux/tibetan-collation/blob/master/implementations/Unicode/rules.txt#L7
&གཉ<གཉྫ

if it is overidden later?

Should གཉ be sorted before གཉྫ or not?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]