This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
[Bug localedata/22019] Wrong placement of monetary symbol in el_GR (negative amounts)
- From: "maiku.fabian at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: libc-locales at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 12:43:42 +0000
- Subject: [Bug localedata/22019] Wrong placement of monetary symbol in el_GR (negative amounts)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-22019-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22019
--- Comment #3 from Mike FABIAN <maiku.fabian at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Christos Georgiou from comment #2)
> Still waiting for an answer from http://www.elot.gr/default_en.aspx , sorry.
>
> However, is there any documentation referencing any standard for the current
> choice of different Positive/Negative formats? If not, then we can consider
> the possibility that the original choice was a mistake.
Yes, I agree.
CLDR has this:
http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/browser/trunk/common/main/el.xml#L5563
<currencyFormats numberSystem="latn">
<currencyFormatLength>
<currencyFormat type="standard">
<pattern>#,##0.00 ¤</pattern>
</currencyFormat>
<currencyFormat type="accounting">
<pattern>#,##0.00 ¤</pattern>
</currencyFormat>
</currencyFormatLength>
I.e. the currency sign comea after the amount.
In some locales like it_CH.xml CLDR has
different patterns for positive and negative
amounts separated by a “;”:
<pattern>¤ #,##0.00;¤-#,##0.00</pattern>
As the el.xml file does not have this, I think we can assume that the
positive and negative amounts use the same pattern.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.