This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
[Bug localedata/16857] Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)
- From: "rranjan at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: libc-locales at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 07:08:19 +0000
- Subject: [Bug localedata/16857] Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-16857-716 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16857
--- Comment #7 from Rajesh Ranjan <rranjan at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Pravin S from comment #6)
> If
>
> a. "raj" is not correct code or
> b we can provide better code than "raj" from its group language.
>
>
> I think, we can go with "raj" for now
> http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/scope.asp#M
Pravin,
Actually, though, mentioned as a language group, Rajasthani is one language for
which demand is to be considered as an 8th schedule language of india.
http://www.outlookindia.com/news/article/Give-Bhojpuri-Rajasthani-Official-Language-Status-MPs/809198
http://www.dnaindia.com/lifestyle/report-rajasthani-language-yet-to-find-mention-in-8th-schedule-say-authors-at-zee-jaipur-literature-festival-1954349
So, can be considered as a locale as some institutions think like this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajasthani_language
"Today, however, Sahitya Akademi, National Academy of Letters and University
Grants Commission recognise it as a distinct language."
So can be considered if standard Rajasthani is used.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.