This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
[Bug localedata/16857] Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)
- From: "rranjan at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: libc-locales at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 08:41:04 +0000
- Subject: [Bug localedata/16857] Adding new locale Rajasthani (raj)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-16857-716 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16857
--- Comment #3 from Rajesh Ranjan <rranjan at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Pravin S from comment #2)
> Created attachment 7635 [details]
> New locale raj_IN
>
> Hi,
>
> I have improved and made attachment to glibc locale format and submitted
> to libc-locales mailing list.
>
> ISO code for locale http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=raj
Pravin,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajasthani_language
as per the page, raj is the inclusive code similar to 'bh' code for Bihari. So
Rajasthani is not a language but a set of language of the following:
bgq â Bagri
gda â Gade Lohar
gju â Gujari
mup â Malvi
wbr â Wagdi
lmn â Lambadi
noe â Nimadi
lrk â Loarki
So I think we should go for one of them ^^ instead of the 'raj'. When
suggesting to Meghraj for having a locale of 'rajasthani', I was not aware of
the fact as talk in parliament of India is going to recognize Rajasthani as
official language. Little confusing!
Meghraj What do you say!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.