This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
Re: [Bug localedata/10580] New file for hr_HR localedata
- From: Keld Simonsen <keld at keldix dot com>
- To: pasky at ucw dot cz <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: libc-locales at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 02:41:35 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Bug localedata/10580] New file for hr_HR localedata
- References: <bug-10580-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/><bug-10580-716-pGLjrZPZks@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:13:28AM +0000, pasky at ucw dot cz wrote:
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10580
>
> --- Comment #13 from Petr Baudis <pasky at ucw dot cz> 2013-02-17 00:13:28 UTC ---
> Keld, of course using the newer standard makes sense; however, I'm not sure
> what do you mean by "further implement" and how that differs from what I wrote.
> If you are interested in discussing this further, I propose we move the
> discussion to the mailing list where more people could follow it. (Note that I
> myself don't have the time to pursue the issue itself, so it makes sense to
> talk more about it only if someone intends to do anything about it.)
So where should we do the discussion? I did think that
this list was relevant. Anyway, the differences are not big,..
It is mostly to align with current glibc implementation, and then
introduce 2 novelties.
Best regards
Keld