This is the mail archive of the libc-locales@sourceware.org mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug localedata/14943] Artificial languages


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14943

Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aj at suse dot de

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> 2012-12-11 21:26:02 UTC ---
Michael, we reworked our position already and recently added Interlingua. I
think an Esperanto locale if properly introduced would be welcome. For details
see the libc-alpha archives.

A big question for me is what kind of country code to use for it - as well what
kind of formats to use for date and time formats.

Could you send a patch to libc-alpha@sourceware.org with a new Esperanto locale
and a rationale for the decisions made, please?

Let's discuss on that list what's the best choice is.

Btw. glibc 2.17 has an initial translation to Esperanto just no locale yet.

thanks,
Andreas

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]